<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/14058325?origin\x3dhttp://croydonian.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

'Borrowed' from elsewhere

Thursday, March 11, 2010
Found this in a b3ta.com thread called 'Letters they'll never read'. The author is someone called Chad.  All I've done is blank the profanities at the end and fix a few typos:


"Dear Gordon Brown...

Look, I know it's been your dream to play at running the country and that your jug-eared friend said he'd let you have a go in much the same way that a kid with a new Playstation says he'll let his poorer mate come round to play it, but then refuses to give up the controller. I know you really, really, wanted to fulfil your egotistical power fantasies, presumably as a way of getting over the fact you were probably bullied through school and were the unfit wheezy kid that everyone picked on.


I understand that you thought letting the country’s finances be run by people whose expertise was based on their ability to wear a suit and lie convincingly was a good idea and that, presumably, you had some thought that meant lending money to those who couldn't afford to repay it in order to secure the votes of the underclasses who felt life was good as they ordered Plasma TVs they couldn't actually pay for was probably sound political thinking.


I understand that you think that spending more on a political witch-hunt over expenses than the expenses claimed had cost was sensible.


I understand that you thought that devolving the UK into petty squabbling factions was genius, despite the fact that Scotland is now a haven for public services that are funded out of the English Parliament (after all, if Scotland, Ireland and Wales are self-governing, then surely England should be, as well).


I understand that you think sending troops into battle with equipment that a boy scout would turn down and under-funding the compensation and treatment of the poor sods who are being blown apart is good fiscal probity, whilst awarding bonuses and medals to Labour civil servants who happen to pass over Afghanistan on a quick jolly is fine.


I understand that it's not fair that people say you're unelected because in the UK we elect the party, not the leader, despite the fact that you have changed the way the party manifesto is headed, thus negating the points on which your party gained power.


I understand you think it's fine to sling accusations of corruption at any competitors, whilst re-hiring and offering a peerage to a man who had to effectively flee the country to a quiet job in the EU over huge scandals over corruption.


I understand that it's not fair to criticise the fact you can't even be bothered to spell a soldier's name correctly in a letter when he has given his life for this country and that it's unfair to blame the fact you're blind in one eye and obviously care about no-one other than yourself.


I understand that you feel it is fine to create an atmosphere in your own cabinet where no-one would even tell you the building is on fire in case you attack them, where you can accept no personal responsibility for any decisions you have made that have gone wrong or which have been found out to be deliberately misleading or dishonest.


I understand this all, Mr Brown, because you are a [...]. I, and 90% of the British public, wouldn't [...] on your gums if your teeth were on fire. How can we trust the leadership of the country to a man whose long-term vision matches his monocular outlook on life? I'm surprised the helmet you wore when trying to look "down with the lads" visiting the troops in Basra didn't have a [...] bullseye on it - why, after all the poor [...]who have been shot, a sniper couldn't have hit you will remain a mystery to me. Presumably it's because you made a deal with the devil you soul-less slack-jawed, pious [...].

Labels:

Art corner

Monday, November 23, 2009
A reader, GD, sent me this link yesterday, for which thanks.  It would have gone up earlier, but the linux laptop was proving recalcitrant, or more likely, I was proving incompetent:



Nicely done, although I am not sure that I would want to fork out for the priviliege of having the Dour One gazing down at me.

There is a rather nifty Obama poster generator here, if anyone fancies having a crack at it.

I see Dizzy has already done this, but I do not suppose our readerships have a 100% overlap.

Here's one I made earlier:


Labels:

Gordon Brown outperformed by the Prime Minister of Burkina Faso

Saturday, October 17, 2009
At least according to "A scientific and unbiased ranking of world leaders in order of hotness", our own dear PM ranks 84th, bettering Manmohan Singh of India but is pipped by Tertius Zongo of Burkina Faso. Or Upper Volta as she used to be known.

Moreover there is more good news, with long time favourite of this blog, Kim Jong Il rated the world's least hot ruler, behind Pope Benedict XVI.  Yulia Tymoshenko of Ukraine is the current leader  

Labels: ,

Hearts of stone department

Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Just been sent a press release by Politics Home on attitudes to a President of Europe.

And quite entertaining it is too, in that it looks like Mr Tony is in this position:

"A prophet is not without honour, but in his own country, and among his own kin, and in his own house" Mark 6:4.

And for why?: Only 37% of us want him strutting around being horribly pleased with himself while being fawned over as 'Mr President', whereas 47% would rather it went to a Belgian from central casting, if we have to have an EU president. Fie upon the 16% who could not muster an opinion. One might note that Mr Tony is a good deal more popular than the party he presumably still pays a membership fee to - latest polls put Labour somewhere in the mid 20s. Does this mean that those wandering away from the red corner want the Prince over the Water to come back, or are there individuals so patriotic, so to speak, that they would rather have a British SOB in charge rather than the Belgian from etc etc? Furthermore, if offered the louse or the flea in a forced choice, 57% oped for Blair, 11% for Brown. Presumably the other 32% hastened to the bathroom cabinet in search of paracetamols, razor blades or whatever else might put them out of their misery.

More details on the poll here.

I am hoping that the hyperactive French pollsters will do the decent thing and ask the Plain People of France who they want, which might then give the opportunity for much pointing and laughing.

(As a footnote, I *almost* miss Blair - at least he had a way with words and gave the impression that he knew what he was doing)

Labels: , ,

A public service announcement

Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Want to avoid the possibility of one's crossbow taking down the albatross this summer?

I have the solution:

"John Mason: To ask the Leader of the House whether she plans to visit Glasgow on official business during the summer adjournment.

Barbara Keeley: My right hon. Friend has no plans, at this time, to visit Glasgow on official business".

The caveat is a little alarming, however.

Labels: ,

Gordon Brown remixed

Thursday, July 16, 2009
Just found this on a viral site. It is nine months old, so feel free to point and laught at me for having fallen off the zeitgeist if everyone else saw it way back.

Made me laugh anyway.

It contains both rude words and coarse humour, and thus cannot be considered work / maiden aunt safe.


Labels: ,

A little fun with Gordon Brown's House of Commons debut

And here it is.

And the best bit:

"the view of the Labour party — [is] that the greatest threat to the ideals of individual freedom and personal responsibility that the present Government so stridently espouse, the grossest affront to human dignity and the gravest assault, on any view of social justice, is mass unemployment and its inevitable consequence, mass poverty".

Unemployment then was a shade over 3m, now it is 2.38m and set to go much higher...

Labels: ,

Some holiday suggestions for the Prime Minister

Thursday, July 02, 2009
Worldpublicopinion.org has been kind enough to poll the world, or parts of it, on their confidence or otherwise in sundry national leaders:

"Now I am going to read a list of political leaders from around the world. Tell me how much
confidence you have in each leader to do the right thing regarding world affairs—a lot of confidence, some confidence, not too much confidence, or no confidence at all".

And the best bit is the data on Brown:

For unfathomable reasons, a clear majority of Kenyans, Hong Kongers, Americans, South Koreans and Indians have confidence in him. A rum business. Were he to hie himself to Nairobi, he could expect to have his path strewn with rose petals, with over 70% having at least some confidence in him. At the other end of the scale, neither Ramallah nor Ankara will cheer him to the echo, as less than 20% of those polled in either Turkey or the Palestinian Authority have faith in his abilities. Perhaps if he holidayed in one of those places, he would feel bathed in a warm glow of approval once back in thse parts. Kiev might be another option, as a majority do not seem to know who he is.

Labels: ,

A little light White House-ology

Sunday, June 28, 2009
Compare and contrast:

"He told Mr Brown to continue showing "integrity" and to be sure that "every day you are waking up and making the very best decisions that you can despite the fact that sometimes the cards in your hand are not very good and the options are narrow". BBC 1/4/9

And:

"During German Chancellor Angela Merkel's White House visit on Friday, one thing topped the agenda: a show of friendship. US President Barack Obama praised Merkel to the hilt, while she returned the compliment. Politics were pushed into the background... [Obama] began with a "Wilkommen" in German, and praised Merkel's "wisdom" and "candor."...Obama greeted "my friend Chancellor Merkel." Der Spiegel 27/6/9

Get the feeling OB has just a touch more respect and amity for the Kanzlerin than the Prime Minister?

Labels: , ,

A brief, but cheering thought

Wednesday, June 03, 2009
Always supposing the worst PM since Goderich manages to limp as far as May next year, if he loses the election he will be the shortest serving Labour PM ever, and the shortest serving PM in almost half a century.

Should all this come to pass, I wish him a Methuselah-long life that he might taste that ignominy for decades to come.

Labels: ,

Caption competition

Monday, June 01, 2009
Spotted by Dominic Graham De Montrose and noted on his Facebook feed:

I noted that 'E, not hate' was an intriguing slogan for the self-styled possessor of supposedly solid Presbytarian values, and Dominic suggested 'Standing in the way of hope'.

Any more for any more?

Note the habitual shocker of a tie knot too.

Labels: ,

Brown publicising one of his books on the No 10 site

Friday, May 29, 2009
Yes he is, it is his book on 'Courage', available for a quid or so from your nearest remainder shop.



Now I am not going to run the risk of putting money in his sporran by buying it, but care of the extract on Aung San Suu Kyi, we now get a sense of his literary style, which is very much famous people who have met me. He uses the first person pronoun 10 times in four paragraphs.

Dizzy has pointed out that at least there is no link to Amazon or wherever that one might buy the book, but being of a cynical bent I refuse to believer that sales considerations did not enter into the thoughts of whichever of his homunculi edited the page. Mrs Brown is also plugging the book, indirectly, via her twitter feed too (qv). Elsewhere she has tweeted the following: 'Free Burma’s dignified Nobel peace laureate Aung San Suu Kyi !!!'. Nice use of exclamation marks, eh?

While I agree with her sentiments, tweeting thus is even less likely to succeed in its aim than all of those inbox clogging e-mails asking the Taliban to stop being beastly of a few years back back.

Labels:

Inaccurate film summaries revisited

Thursday, May 07, 2009
Our own dear Prime Minister has joined in, The Independent having asked him which film has changed his life:

"I choose "Chariots of Fire" because it's all about the potential of young people being realised".

I'm *not* making this up.

Labels: ,

The 'professionalism' of Brown's web people

Saturday, May 02, 2009
A screengrab from the No 10 site:



I make the odd typo, agreed, but there's just one of me, and no-one is paying me either.

Labels: ,

Sarkozy misses an opportunity

Friday, April 17, 2009
Sarkozy has been caught running his mouth about some of his international counterparts (short term link from El Pais):

Zapatero: “Perhaps he’s not very intelligent”.

Obama: "Very bright and charismatic” but “without a stance” on many issues.

Merkel: "Had no option but to assume the same position as me” when she saw the state of
her banks and auto industry.

And Brown?

Nothing. Not a mumbling word. While Sarkozy doubtless deemed Brown unworthy of comment, it would have been amusing to have seen Brown skewered one way or another.

Labels: ,

Why Gordon Brown is unfit to be Prime Minister

Monday, April 06, 2009
Because he has not mastered one of the basic sartorial arts, that of knotting a tie. All of these photographs are taken from the Downing St flickr stream, so these are photographs which his homunculi think are good. I have picked out the Ds and Es, and a scan of the stream will throw out the occasional C+, but that is about as good as it ever gets.

Exhibit A:

Just look at it. The average primary school pupil could do better. Loose, no shape, bad even by the standars of a four-in-hand knot. How much confidence would you have in a solicitor or a bank manager who dressed like that?

Exhibit B:


Exhibit C:

Another shocker

Exhibits D and E:



I have seen photographs of him where the knot has made me wince. What makes this particularly painful is that he generally sports heavyweight silk ties, not polyester horrors. As such, this is rather like drinking vintage claret from a plastic cup. Another serial sartorial offence is jacket gape at the back of his shirt collar, as in the Biden photo, exhibit E. Furthermore, his wife - formerly in PR, so well aware of image issues - allows him out in public dressed that, so he cannot claim the excuse of a careless bachelor.

Of the other male holders of the great offices of state, Miliband gets it right more often than not and Darling performs quite well. As to other potential PMs, Cameron is near invariably impeccable knot-wise, and Nick Clegg (no sniggering at the back) fares respectably. All of the previous Labour PMs outperform Brown too.

There are some other horrors which did not want to be downloaded here, here and here.


And he has form:



I would add a photo of YT showing how it is done, but the only recent photos of me suited and booted are either a little out of focus or show me a tad refreshed. Well, it was circa midnight and at a friend's wedding reception.

Labels: ,

Gordon Brown rated the world's 10th biggest loser

Monday, March 23, 2009
'Foreign Policy' has decided to get its hands dirty and rate the month's losers, and Brown only rates 10th, although he makes 7th among politicians, loosely defined. Top of the list is Josef Fritzl, a fairly difficult act to follow.

Here's the encomium for Brown:

"It's hard to hate Gordon Brown. In fact, it's hard not to feel bad for the guy. This is due in part to the fact that he is Britain's first prime minister who is also part basset hound. Also, he had to follow Tony Blair who was quite telegenic and appealing, particularly in that phase of his career when he was being played by Michael Sheen. (Less so later when he was being played by one of George W. Bush's hand-puppets.) Still, Gordon did accept the job of PM, did screw it up to a fare-thee-well and now is on the verge of blowing his last big moment on the public stage as he prepares to host a G20 Summit that is very likely to realize somewhere between zero and few of his grand ambitions for it".

The magazine is published in Washington DC, so the misplaced lack of venom is perhaps understandable. The 'basset hound' link gives a potted history of the breed etc, but it seemed sufficiently amusing to leave in.

Labels:

A brief observation on minimum prices for alcohol

Monday, March 16, 2009
Doubtless there is much vituperation going on elsewhere, but for now note this:

"Prime Minister Gordon Brown said that he did not want to penalise "moderate" drinkers. Speaking at a press conference at 10 Downing Street on Monday he said: "We don't want the responsible, sensible majority of moderate drinkers to have to pay more or suffer as a result of the excesses of a minority."

And this:

Budget 2008: "Beer duty to increase by 4p per pint, wine up 14p a bottle, cider up 3p a bottle and spirits up 55p a bottle".

And this:

Budget 2007
: "Beer up 1p per pint from midnight on Sunday, cider up 1p per litre. Wine up 5p a bottle and sparkling wine up 7p. No change for spirits".

Budget 2006: "Duties on beer and wine will increase in line with inflation, adding 1 penny to a pint of beer and 4 pence to a standard 75 centilitre bottle of wine; and duty on sparkling wine and cider will be frozen".

So, good news then - clearly there will be no changes to drinks duties in the next Budget. Will there?

Labels: , ,

The significance of Brown's visit to the Americans

Tuesday, March 03, 2009

There he is, fifth lead, well and truly below the fold.

Labels: ,

Brown's carbon footprint revealed.

Monday, March 02, 2009
French mag Terra Eco, quoted in Le Figaro, has come up with figures for the carbon footprints of sundry politicians, and our own dear PM heads the list at 8,400 tonnes of CO2 in 2008. Merkel follows at 7,400 tonnes, then Sarko at 7,100 and Zapatero at 6,700. Berlusconi and Putin are not listed, for some reason.

Brown, however, is not the one racking up the most air miles, he managed 98,000 to Sarko's 201,000. Both Merkel and Zapatero have 108,000 miles attributed to them. Sarko is helped by his use of a modern aircraft in the Airbus A319.

Mildly amusing though all this, the figures have scarcely more credibility than if they had been pulled out of thin air, as Downing Street refused to tell the mag the types of aircraft Brown used. Knowing that he uses 747s, 777s and 757s, they averaged the emissions of the three. How about that for data integrity.

Labels: , ,