<body><iframe src="http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=14058325&amp;blogName=The+Croydonian&amp;publishMode=PUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT&amp;navbarType=BLUE&amp;layoutType=CLASSIC&amp;homepageUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fcroydonian.blogspot.com%2F&amp;searchRoot=http%3A%2F%2Fcroydonian.blogspot.com%2Fsearch" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" height="30px" width="100%" id="navbar-iframe" title="Blogger Navigation and Search"></iframe> <div id="space-for-ie"></div>

Guess how many special advisers Brown has.

Thursday, July 24, 2008
I would have guessed four or five, with an outside maximum of ten.

He has, in fact, twenty four.

And here they are: Greg Beales, Theo Bertram, Nicola Burdett, Stephen Carter, Konrad Caulkett, Matt Cavanagh, Dan Corry, Colin Currie, Jo Dipple, Justin Forsyth, Michael Jacobs, Gavin Kelly, Richard Lloyd, Patrick Loughran, Damian McBride, Jennifer Moses (unpaid, which is nice), David Muir, Geoffrey Norris, Sue Nye, Nick Pearce, Lisa Perrin, Paul Sinclair, Nick Stace and Stewart Wood.

Three of them are part time, so I suppose one could be generous and say 22.5.

Firstly, that is not a kitchen cabinet, it is a class room of the little blighters, and haven't they, collectively, proved to be about as much use as an inflatable dartboard. I do not suppose that 'SpAd to Broon 2008' on a CV is going to open many doors come The Reckoning. They cannot be all that special either.

Further, these people are making a very nice scratch, four of them making £140,560, and all making at least a shade under £40,000.

Other ministers generally have two apiece, but respect to Flint, Benn, Baroness Royall (of Blaisdon, no less), Murphy, Browne and Purnell for making do with just one.

Labels: ,

"Weimar without the sex"

Wednesday, July 23, 2008
From Christopher Hitchens' 'For the Sake of Argument' (Verso 1993) writing of the fag-end of the Callaghan administration:

"The end result was a sort of Weimar without the sex: the country mortgaged to the IMF, placementship and jobbery everywhere from the Washington Embassy to the Bank of England; and an indecorous last-minute vote buying exercise involving both the Ulster Unionists and the Irish Republicans".

A little tweaking and it sounds somewhat like our own times.

Labels:

The man with all the comic timing of the Bay of Pigs Invasion

Monday, July 21, 2008
Yes, our very own, very dear Prime Minister:

"Poor Gordon Brown," a senior official in the Foreign Ministry said on Sunday, "he just happened to visit Israel the same week U.S. presidential candidate Barack Obama is expected to arrive and isn't receiving much attention." Indeed, visiting Israel on the same week that Obama is expected to arrive is like being the opening act for the Beatles.

There were few signs on the streets of Jerusalem yesterday that the prime minister of one of Israel's most important allies...For some reason, Union Jack flags were nowhere to be seen in the capital.

Brown's arrival is also in the shadow of the recent visit by French President Nicolas Sarkozy. Sarah Brown may be a founding partner in a public relations firm and a supporter of charities, but she's no Carla Bruni".
Thanks to Haaretz.com for the extract.

Shades of his disastrous trip to the US when he was, unsurprisingly, overshadowed by the Bishop of Rome. Don't the idiots in his office ever check diaries and the like?

Labels: ,

That man Brown

Thursday, July 10, 2008
Compare and contrast:



Broon's reply is here:



For those who cannot be bothered with the erms and ums etc,

"One question saw "Jazza" ask the Prime Minister what he could do for the country that nobody else could. The PM replied that he was determined and focussed on changing the country and on giving everyone the chance to make "the most of their talents"."Why do I want to do this job, because there are things that I can do, I want every child and every young person in this country to have the chance to realise the potential to the full."My idea in life, why I get up in the morning is everyone should have the chance to make the most of there talents, that's what I am determined to do." Note he does not even begin to answer the thrust of the question, and one might wonder whether wits at Downing Street made this the lead video in order to hold Brown up to richly deserved ridicule and contempt.


Generally Brown's rather sad attempts to get down wiv the kids are not worthy of note, but the OECD has just lacerated the post '97 regime's approach to youth unemployment etc, and here , in a handy table are the figures:


As ever, click for heightened visibility, but the key points are an increase in NEETs, a fall in the employment rate, a rise in the unemployment rate and a higher unemployment rate for the low skilled relative to the OECD average. So, for the last 12 years he has been party to being 'determined and focussed on changing the country and on giving everyone the chance to make "the most of their talents". With great success, evidently.

Labels: , ,

If Brown loses Glasgow East....

Monday, July 07, 2008
For the sheer joy of psephology, I have been rooting around in the electoral stats at Richard Kimber's PolSci resources page at Keele University, and have come up with a list of the pigs with red rosettes that would be left if Labour were to lose Glasgow East by one vote.

By my reckoning, there would be some 40 Labour MPs left, all having majorities of 13,600 or more. However, it is not a list awash with household names, those that would definitely (?) register with the man in the street being Skinner, D, Brown, G, Blunkett, D, Reid, J, Byers, S, Vaz, K and Cooper, Y.

Wonks and other obsessives will know of Chris Bryant - no sniggering at the back -, Eric Joyce, Ian McCartney (short trollish character, yes?), Fraser 'the undertaker' Kemp, Andy 'how much mascara are you sporting?' Burnham and Peter Kilfoyle. I suspect that John Cummings of Easington, Joe Benton of Bootle and Francis Hywel of Aberavon can use public transport without being harassed by voters from outside their constituencies.

I'd like to see the Dour One knock up a shadow cabinet from that rather unpromising timber.

Labels: , ,

Having one's hopes dashed - an object lesson

Friday, June 27, 2008
Just for a fraction of a heartbeat it looked as though Hold the Front Page had quite a scoop. OK, the details looked iffy, but reading the headline something leapt out at me:

"Journalist Gordon Brown dies aged 71".

Ah well. My condolences to the family of the original Gordon Brown, who sounds as though he was a decent sort.

And with thought, I am shutting down until some time on Monday as I have a wedding in Spain to attend. Moderation is on, but I plan to authorise comments at least once a day.

Labels:

Brown - the view from Paris

Thursday, June 26, 2008
From Le Figaro, reviewing PMQs:

"Each week the bags under his eyes look ever deeper and his skin more grey. His nervous tics betray the rage he tries to suppress in the face of the jabs from Conservative leader David Cameron. Whereas [Cameron] appears confident and relaxed, Gordon Brown answers stiffly and often stutters. His defence is limited to a tedious repetition of the achievements in eleven years of New Labour".

(Our French chums have one word - 'cernes' - for bags under the eyes. Very economical).

Labels: , ,

Brown popular in Nigeria shocker

Saturday, June 21, 2008
Our ashtray on a motorbike of a prime minister has the confidence of the majority of both Americans and Nigerians, as a survey by WorldPublicopinion.org shows.

Those two nations see 59% having a lot / some confidence in Broon doing the right thing in world affairs, narrowly ahead of South Korea at 57%, China at 50% and - the shame of it - my fellow citizens at 48%.

Our neighbours are fairly unimpressed - 35% of the French rate him, as do 22% of Spaniards.

At the other end of the scale, the Jordanians show their usual good sense with 72% having little or no confidence, likewise 90% of 'Palestinians'.

Meanwhile, the Egyptians impress by having 99% able to decide one way or the other, whereas only 43% of Ukrainians can. I guess Broon's books are not big sellers in Kiev.

Labels: ,

So much for 'prudence' and the 'golden rule'

Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Straight from EUPravda:

"The United Kingdom's budgetary position has deteriorated over the past year and is expected to rise above the 3% of GDP reference value in the financial year ending in March 2009. In line with the Treaty, the Commission has therefore initiated the excessive deficit procedure" said Joaquín Almunia, Economic and Monetary Affairs Commissioner.

...


The planned figure for 2008/09 provides
prima facie evidence of the existence of an excessive deficit in the UK.

...


Having examined the budgetary developments as well as the short- and medium-term economic prospects and policy action taken by the UK government,
the Commission concludes that the planned excess of the deficit over the reference value cannot be considered exceptional or temporary and suggests that the UK is not respecting the deficit criterion set in the Treaty.

Since 2002/03, the United Kingdom has not built a sufficient "safety margin" for fiscal policy to operate freely and supportively during normal economic downturns without significant risk of breaching the reference value. Fiscal policy was expansionary in 2007/08, in spite of robust growth, leading to a deficit estimated to have increased slightly from 2.6% of GDP in 2006/07 to 2.9% of GDP in 2007/08.

Whilst general government gross debt is projected to remain below the 60% of GDP reference value set in the EU Treaty, debt has been on a rising trend since 2001 to reach an estimated 43.8% of GDP last year.


Quite what the Commissariat is going to do apart from telling the Dour One to stand in the corner is unclear. Meanwhile I rue not knowing any Socialist and EU true believers, so I will be denied the simple pleasure of pointing and laughing.

Labels: , ,

Headline o' the day

Tuesday, May 20, 2008
"Gordon Brown wins victory over human-animal embryos". Source

Well, embryonic minotaurs would not have been able to put up much of a fight, would they?

Labels: ,

And if Brown resigns for 'health reasons'?

Monday, May 12, 2008
I cannot see Brown willingly letting go of the brass ring, having finally got his greasy mitts on it, but should Straw and the other eminences grise of the party persuade him to do so, there is the potential for a fearfully long interregnum while the People's Party grinds into action. It does beg the question as to who would be running the show while Brown is locked away in a sanatorium?

Unlike Blair, Brown has foregone making the deputy leader of the Labour Party the deputy PM, although I imagine that Harman would be most keen to insist that she should become the PM pending a leadership election should Brown be pushed. Straw would probably present himself as a safe pair of hands, and if truth be told, he would be the sensible choice for that caretaker role. As with Beckett in '94 or whenever it was, both Straw and Harman would regard the stopgap role as a dress rehearsal for the real thing.

As has been noted elsewhere, the Tories do regicide rather better than Labour, but the Hague leadership rules would make the process of replacing a sitting Tory PM messy and drawn out too. While Brown could name a deputy PM - and there should be as clear cut a line of succession as there is in the US - I do not imagine that he will, as that would be an admission that he is indeed mortal.

So, perhaps I should be careful what I wish for, although if Straw were in charge one might at least expect a degree of competence.

Labels: ,

Can't Brown get anything right?

Thursday, May 08, 2008
Just spotted this in the transcript of his speech about the Miracle on the Med (not that he called it that):

"Naturally I agreed to do it and I spent some time writing the lecture. It was only at the last minute, literally a day or two before, when I was making arrangements to get to the Hilton Hotel that I discovered it was not the Hilton Hotel in London where I was to speak, but the Hilton Hotel in Tel Aviv".


Either he (or rather his flunkeys) could not find Brown's backside with the aid of both hands, a bank of klieg lights and shouted out instructions, or this is the lamest attempt of humour this year.

Labels: ,

"A rightwards swing on a European scale"

Sunday, May 04, 2008
That's what a professor at Science Po in Gay Paree is calling it, noting that of the 11 general elections in Europe since 2007, the Right has retained or taken power except in Spain.

And there's more:

"In countries where the [far?] Left is strong...social democratic / socialist have suffered significant reverses. That is the backdrop to the election in Rome and London". Further details at Le Monde.

Maybe Broon should have used that as part of his grab bag of excuses in his interview with Marr this morning.

Meanwhile, some descriptions of Boris from the French dailies:

"This extravagant figure of the Right....this painted bird" Le Monde. (L'oiseau bariolé is also a novel and a Paris gay bar. Ho hum)

"Eccentric Conservative". Le Figaro

"Eccentric" La Tribune.

Labels: , ,

Where was Gordon?

Friday, May 02, 2008
Sarko and Merkel have quite the love in at a euro bun fight in Aachen, where Frau Merkel has just picked up the 'Charlemagne Prize for European leadership'. Apparently 'she taught him patience'. Now he'll have to have Solitaire blocked on his PC if he is to get any work done.

First problem is that it really ought to be the Karl der Grosse prize, given KdG spoke something nearer German than French, and the second is that the Carolingian Empire was spread by the sword rather than by accession treaties. Pick the leader of any aggressor state on the continent from the last 2000 or so years for an equally good claim to be the father of European unity... That man who ruled France after the war famously blocked UK accession to the Common Market (as was) on the grounds that we had 'wrecked the last attempt at European unity and would not let us do it again'. I believe he was referring to the Napoleonic, rather than Hitlerian system.

Anyway, here's the guest list:

"among those on the guest list Thursday were Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, Belgian Prime Minister Yves Leterme, Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker and King Juan Carlos of Spain". Well, given that Gordon and Angela are not on each others Christmas card lists, maybe it was a snub. Unlikely, more realistic is that the Worst Prime Minister since Godereich did not want to be seen hob nobbing with the Eurotrash on election day.

Past laureates from Blighty are Churchill (yes, really. In '56), Heath ('63), Jenkins ('72) and that balding bloke ('99) with the odd looking wife who used to run the show in these parts.

In perhaps the oddest award of all time, 'the people of Luxembourg' won it in 1986.

Labels: ,

Heckling Brown's 'green' speech

Thursday, May 01, 2008
I read the first few sentences and could feel my hackles rising, so here is a stream of consciousness barracking of the speech:

I am delighted to have been invited here today by His Royal Highness, the Prince of Wales - and let me start by praising him, on behalf of everyone attending the events today, for the immense contribution he has made to raising public awareness of the need to look after the planet on which we live - and to stimulating action on sustainability by both business and governments.

I want a knighthood

And I am pleased too to be here with so many distinguished businessmen and women -- all of whom understand that your reputation and success depends on the investments you make not just in new products but in the communities you serve.

They want knighthoods, or at least jobs on quangos once they retire.

A year ago today, 1000 business leaders gathered together across ten locations in Britain to pledge to take action on climate change, within their companies and with their employees, suppliers and customers.

Remember that? I don’t.

The event sparked the May Day Network - a national movement of businesses taking a lead in moving the UK towards a low carbon economy.

Yup, all pretty obscure.

And today you have come to report back on the progress that has been made.

I have heard that half of you have provided information to business in the community about your carbon footprint;

Half of you’. So he has an audience of sympathisers, and half of them manage to follow the script.

  • 40 per cent of you have set and reported on carbon reduction targets;

And they might not have done a damned thing about lowering them. Maybe they have told staff to go outside for breath breaks.

  • And many others have made energy efficiency savings by changing working practices.

Like not changing dead lightbulbs?

All great achievements.

Oh absolutely. Let’s have an orgy of self-congratulation

But despite these advances, you are here today - and so am I - because we all know that more must be done. And we want many others to see the benefits of joining with us in our endeavour.

You can’t just sent in a form and expect a knighthood you know.

So this morning I want to talk to you not just about the challenge of climate change but about its opportunities:

  • the opportunity to create jobs, to build businesses, to grow exports, to drive productivity;

Uh-huh. Yeah, right.

  • and more than that, the opportunity to liberate the creativity and innovation of British companies and British communities. For nothing less than this will enable us to meet the challenge.

And a speech from Brown is going to do that is it? And will the public be sent to the naughty step if it does not?

The Stern Report - published 18 months ago - showed that the economic cost of the kind of climate change which the world is currently headed for would be comparable to the economic effects of a great depression combined with world war.

Because the effect of an ice age / global warming / whatever is the fashionable scare story this week is so readily quantifiable, isn’t it?

But what the report also demonstrated is that - momentous as the challenge is - the costs of urgent action are far less than the costs of delay; and the earlier we act, the easier and less expensive our task will be.

See previous.

So the issue is not, as some would have it: can we afford to do more?
The now undeniable reality is that we cannot afford to accept any less.

Repeat after me, I will read Popper on the logic of scientific discovery before I go grandstanding about ‘scientific facts’.

And that is why the British government is committed to building a low carbon economy -- both here in the UK and around the world.

I would have thought wrecking the current economy would be a closer match.

That means doing all we can to ensure an ambitious post-2012 global agreement for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, with every country playing their part. And Britain is leading efforts to promote the building blocks of that agreement:

  • on financing we have proposed a new global fund to help developing countries reduce their emissions and adapt to climate change;

A proposal? How marvellous. I do not doubt that the less developed economies are just itching to stay pre-industrial with all that that implies.

  • on deforestation - which His Royal Highness rightly identifies as a key priority - we are funding major sustainable forestry projects in the Congo Basin and elsewhere;

Paying fair value for the land, are we?

  • and on technology we are pioneering carbon capture and storage and other vital energy technologies around the world.

What about destroying it? Maybe that would be a good idea too?

But it also means a significant change in our energy economy here in Britain. Indeed I believe it will require no less than a fourth technological revolution.

Oh dear, après moi, les clichés.

In the past the steam engine, the internal combustion engine and the microprocessor transformed not just technology but the way society was organised and the way people lived. Now we are about to embark on a comparable technological transformation - to low carbon energy and energy efficiency.

And it would seem you do not approve of the first two, do you?

And because energy use pervades every aspect of our lives, this - in turn - will imply an economic and social transformation: in the way our businesses operate and in the way we live our lives.

Nice bit of dodgy reasoning there.

No one should underestimate the scale of the challenge this represents. But if we can do it successfully, the benefits will be immense:

  • greater energy efficiency improving economic productivity;

Yup, let’s work with the lights off.

  • the demand for environmental goods and services creating new jobs and new business opportunities;

What about telling the nice people about lost jobs and business threats?

  • and the development of green technologies opening up new export markets throughout the world.

And who is to say those markets will be open?

And the nations that seize these opportunities will reap the largest rewards.

All relative isn’t it?

Globally, it is estimated that industries such as renewable energy, waste management and water treatment will be worth $700 billion by 2010 - equal to the value of the global aerospace industry. And the overall added value of the low carbon energy sector by 2050 could be as high as $3 trillion per year worldwide, employing more than 25 million people.

‘Could be’

If Britain maintains its share of this growth there could be over a million people employed in our environmental industries within the next two decades.

All of whom will have a heavily invested interest in hyping every last ‘climate change’ issue. Great.

So building our own low carbon economy offers us the chance to create thousands of new British businesses and hundreds of thousands of new British jobs.

So says the man who has never worked outside politics, academia and the media.

Estimates suggest our environmental sector is already worth £25 billion - employing 400,000 people - and could more than double within 20 years. The City of London has become a global hub for carbon trading and the UK is poised to become the world leader in installed capacity of offshore wind. We have a strong history of innovation and remain world leaders in scientific research. And we have a stable macroeconomic climate, an improving skills base, and flexible product and labour markets.

Ssshh, don’t mention the recession.

So Britain is ideally placed to help minimise the costs of the move towards a low carbon, resource-efficient economy while maximising the opportunities.

Just like that, as Tommy Cooper would have said.

But to do this we have to unlock the talent and potential of our economy and our society.

For the fact is that a low carbon society will not emerge from 'business as usual'. It will require new thinking and new technologies. It will involve new forms of economic activity and social organisation. It will mean new kinds of consumer behaviour and lifestyles. And it will demand creativity, innovation and entrepreneurialism throughout our economy and our society - a new drive to unlock the talents and skills of our people, our companies, our workforces and our communities.

New – five uses in that paragraph. Change ‘new’ to ‘unknown’, and one is nearer the mark.

For businesses I believe this is an exciting opportunity.

Already over the last few years I have seen a transformation in the priority given to environmental sustainability by companies, big and small, in every sector. Many firms have recognised that operating in a more sustainable way is not just good for the planet but is good for them - and is what their customers want too.

Greenwashing is all a bit last week now, isn’t it?

At the same time every firm can now see the value of investing in energy and resource efficiency measures

  • giving a net profit not a cost, with earlier payback times than anticipated. And for larger firms the opportunity to influence not only their own resource consumption but to green their supply chains is becoming clear.

Gordon, old bean, these captains of industry, if that is what they are already know how to read a balance sheet.

So we want to see British businesses take these opportunities, as so many are now doing. But they will rightly ask in turn what government is doing to support them.

The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' Ronald Reagan.

Last year our Commission on Environmental Markets and Economic Performance published an expert report on what the government could do to help Britain benefit economically from the new environmental agenda. Today, we are setting out our response to their recommendations. And let me highlight the four areas where we are focusing our efforts.

First, we are setting a clear, credible, long-term policy framework --- because we know that only this will encourage businesses to invest and enable the timely development of innovative products and services.

But you will only be here for another two years, woncha?

Through the Climate Change Bill we are the first country to put into legislation a statutory cap on our emissions ---- with five-year carbon budgets set on the advice of an independent climate change committee providing certainty for investors, business and consumers.

Whoopee do….

Every new policy will be examined for its impact on carbon emissions - not just those which reduce emissions, but those which increase them. Where emissions rise in one sector, we will have to achieve corresponding falls in another.

Every new policy? I’m calling BS on that one.

And this UK framework is now set within a clear set of European goals --- tough targets for a 20 per cent reduction in overall greenhouse gas emissions by 2020, or 30 per cent as part of an international agreement. And a strengthening of the carbon market created by the EU emissions trading scheme, which now covers nearly 50 per cent of Britain's emissions.

As in the EU is the puppeteer yanking your strings, eh?

Within this overall framework, Britain is establishing long-term low carbon policies across our economy.

In energy, we have committed to meeting our share of the EU target that 20 per cent should come from renewable sources by 2020.

No parliament may bind its successor.

In transport, we are proposing the EU adopt an ambitious target of reducing, by 2020, average CO2 emissions of new cars to 100 grammes per km.

Proposing.

In aviation, we are pressing for emissions from flights to be included as soon as possible within the EU emissions trading scheme.

Pressing.

In housing, we have agreed a timetable for all new homes to be zero carbon from 2016 - with new non-domestic buildings meeting this target three years later.

And what percentage of our housing stock is replaced every year? Less than 1% I imagine.

And it is these long-term policies that are driving the creation of new markets for environmental goods and services.

Second, the Government aims to create the conditions for innovation through our approach to regulation, to procurement and to research and development.

Check Ronald the Great’s comment from earlier

As we set out in our innovation white paper, we will work with the Business Council for Britain and industry regulators to ensure that regulation rewards rather than retards innovation.

Regulation is also known as red tape, isn’t it?

We will give priority to low-carbon and sustainable products in our procurement policies, helping give industry confidence to invest in their development.

And thus make the entry costs to meeting government contracts all the higher for start up companies.

And we are increasing support for R&D in sustainable energy technologies such as offshore wind and marine energy through our new £1 billion public-private Energy Technologies Institute.

And how much of the funding is ‘yours’?

Our third priority is to ensure that our workforce has the skills and the expertise for the environmental industries and occupations of the future.

And haven’t you done well with education recently.

So we will work with employers to create apprenticeship and 'Train to Gain' places in environmental sectors, and bring forward plans for a national skills academy for environmental industries.

Sounds like the MacDonalds College of Hamburgerology.

Fourth, we are seeking to encourage changes in consumer behaviour. For we know that we will only succeed if individuals and communities, as well as government and business, are part of the solution.

Encouraging? With a round of applause, or through the scourge?

That is why we launched last month our 'Act on CO2' advice line, a one-stop shop for consumer advice and information on energy and water efficiency, waste and recycling and green transport. And why later this month we will begin a high profile advertising campaign highlighting what consumers can do to reduce their carbon footprint. Nearly one million people have already used our web-based 'carbon calculator'.

I do not doubt the phone is ringing off the hook. Still, there are some of those jobs you reckoned would be created.

The Government's approach is based on the 'I will if you will' principle. We can only ask consumers to make greener choices if we make it easy for them to do it - and we will ask businesses to be part of this too.

Not ‘I’ll show you mine if you show me yours’?

So we want people to install loft and cavity wall insulation - and we are providing discounts funded by energy companies. We expect 5 million more homes to be insulated over the next three years.

Discounts big enough for them to brag about under CSR etc in their corporate reports, but small enough not to impact the bottom line, no doubt.

We want people to buy greener cars if they can - so we have reformed the system of vehicle excise duty to ensure there is a tax incentive in every class of car.

Just sell them the spray cans.

And we want to see the elimination of single-use carrier bags - so we have asked the retailers to come up with a voluntary solution but will take a statutory power to require it if we have to.

Or the tax on single blokes. I am anticipating having to turn a lot of carrier bags inside out at the checkout rather than give charging supermarkets free advertising.

But let me also say that I know that in the end consumers will not change their behaviour because government asks them to. Green consumption needs to become part of the culture and part of people's lifestyles. And for that we need to find new ways to engage them.

I don’t have ‘a lifestyle’. I have ‘a live’. Try it.

So what I want to see is a different kind of consumer campaign, led by civil society organisations and consumer-facing businesses, which can help embed greener choices in people's lives. And I have asked Fiona Reynolds of the National Trust and Ian Cheshire of B&Q to see how this might be done.

Ah, they do the nagging for you. The gongs are in the post, Fiona and Ian.

So this is our vision:

(Insert tasteless joke about cyclops here)

  • a green economy providing new jobs and business opportunities...
  • powered by the innovation of our firms and the skills of our workforce...
  • driven not just by long-term government policy but by green behaviour as an integral part of people's lives.

Each of us - businesses, consumers and government - need to play our part. And working together I have no doubt that this is a challenge to which the human spirit - and our powers of ingenuity and enterprise - will rise.

Oh dear, the human spirit. This is just embarrassing, isn’t it?

Labels: , ,

Someone thinks Brown is King Canute

Friday, April 25, 2008
" We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to prevent coastal erosion on the east coast of Yorkshire". Source

As opposed to the west coast of Yorkshire, of course.


And yes I know it was Canute's SpAd's who thought he could hold back the sea, not the king himself.

Labels: ,

Brown's new corporatism

Tuesday, April 22, 2008
Many, many years ago, the governments of Wilson and Callaghan would host meetings with trade union leaders which were dubbed 'beer and sandwich' sessions. While the reason for meeting with the Gormleys and Murrays of this world was largely due to Wilson lacking the ideology and the courage to stop them from holding the taxpayer to ransom, there was an attempt to present the process as being representative of the corporate state - the idea being that there were a range of power centres in the land, based on functional groups that negotiated with each other, so to speak, Back in the mid 80s when I was suffering some of the duller aspects of constitutional law at UCL (a lukewarm bed of SDP activists, by the way) I roundly dismissed the idea that the corporate state could be said to exist in the UK, given that Thatcher was brooking rather less nonsense from (some) special interests than her predecessors.

Anyway, The Worst Prime Minister Since Goderich (1) would seem to be intent on resurrecting corporatism, in that his favourite way of filling time between sessions of nail-biting seems to be to meet with some group or other and then to present it as showing how in touch, and how dynamic he is, how he cracks heads, kicks backsides, takes names etc etc. So, the other week it was 'the bankers', and next up he will 'host a meeting of food producers, retailers and consumers today to deal with the growing world food crisis'.

'Deal with'. Savour that, if you will. The attendees list shows a list comprised largely of quangocrats, NGO-istas and political types. The nearest one gets to the sharp end of growing food is some bod from the NFU. There's also a chap from Sainsburys. 'Deal with?' I will offer the traditional odds of Lombard Street to a rotten orange that they will not 'deal with' anything, but rather will chat away for a bit and achieve precisely nothing beyond a photo opportunity for Brown.

Where Brown differs from Wilson / Callaghan, is that none of the groups being dealt with can be said to have their hands around his throat yet, more's the pity. Rather than seeing these people because he has no choice, or doing it as per the spin, I would suggest that Brown is doing it as an exercise in blame shifting. Instead of taking responsibility for policy failures, and recognising that the game is up when it comes to blaming previous Tory administrations, Brown's latest trick is to make those he drags along to his meetings complicit in his errors. That the people are vain enough to be his useful idiots is dispiriting. I would hope that at least one banker, industrialist or whatever will be prepared to kiss goodbye to a knighthood and risk being monstered in what remains of the tame media - BBC, Grauniad, Mirror etc - by either publicly refusing to attend such a meeting, or else to emerge from No. 10 and declare quite how shambolic it is in the bunker. I'm not holding my breath.


(1) From the No 10 site:

"...Goderich lacked support among his colleagues and in his party, and he was not up to the task of running a quarrelling Cabinet. Goderich had difficulty in coping practically and emotionally. He resigned after four months in office, before he had achieved anything of note.

He also used to burst into tears at the dispatch box.

Labels: ,