<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/14058325?origin\x3dhttp://croydonian.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

How enthusiastic are you about voting?

Wednesday, March 11, 2009
I ask, as Politics Home has come up with a new slant on political polling by asking how enthusiastic or otherwise Tory, Labour or Lib Dem voters are about voting for their preferred parties.

Tories have the highest percentage of 'very enthusiastic' would be voters at 47%, while the other two rate 34% and 24% respectively. Combining very and vanilla 'enthusiastic' gives 75% to the Tories, 65% for Labour and 66% for the Lib Dems. So not quite so stark a division between the three, and what folk say may not indicate what they feel. Perhaps LDs are more reticent.

Anyway, offered the choice of being 'actively depressed but I cannot see a better option' sees figures of C 5, L 5 and LD 11.

The PH pundit sees the totality of these findings as indicative of a hard Tory vote and a comparatively soft LD vote, but I read it otherwise. Firstly, if I was a Tory voter in Merthyr Tydfil or a Socialist in Mole Valley, I would have absolutely no expectation of my party winning in my lifetime, and I would argue that it is the expectation of the result rather than the act of voting that depresses. Similarly, LDs are well aware that the best that they can hope for overall for is a hung parliament, and that looks unlikely at present, quite apart the hundreds of seats where they are a sideshow to the two big beasts.

There can be precious few folk who hand on heart could claim that they support every last thing in a manifesto, and the depressed voters probably also encompass europhile / hanger and flogger / EU rejectionist Tories, deep Blairite and Clause IV Socialists and more free market inclined LDs. Doubtless if PR ever came in the three leading parties would find their internal contradictions and tensions would tear them apart.

Labels: ,

Electoral suicide, French style

Saturday, August 16, 2008
Ouest France, very kindly, has polled Gauls on what they think of the French Socialists, and even more kindly, Libération has published the figures a day early.

Ségo, Delanoë et al are reckoned to be letting down La Patrie by failing to oppose Sarko's / Fillon's government with sufficient vigour (52%), understanding the preoccupations of the man on the Limoges autobus (55%), not to have good leaders (66%), and not knowing what it is doing (67%).

As to what the PS should do, 41% of Gauls want it to get into bed with Bayrou's MoDem (sort of Lib Dem types), 30% to link with the non-Trot extreme left (PCF, Greens) and 18% want it to cosy up to baby-faced rot postie Besancenot's Trot rabble. Curious bunch. As to left leaning voters, 45% want a menage à trois with the broad extreme left and 12% with the Trots. Were I Gaullist I would be very very keen on a link with as many loons as possible, popular fronts being unlikely to be all that popular with the aforementioned Limogeois/e passager d'autobus.

As to who will lead the Socialists to the sunny uplands of the voters hearts, the general populace want it to be Dominique Strauss-Kahn, currently the king over the water at the IMF, while leftists want Ségo to have another crack at it. Hope they choose Ségo again, as she has been a source of immense amusement with her 'curious' statements. Expect Sarkozy to have her, or any other contender, for petit déjeuneur in 2012.

Labels: , , ,

The French would vote 'no' to Lisbon too

Thursday, July 03, 2008
At least according to this poll I have just found:

'Those opposed to the treaty secure 53% of voice as opposed to 47% in favour. Equally, 33% of those polled would abstain'.

And here is the interesting bit:

'73% of yes voters and 72% of no voters from 2005 would vote the same way now'.

Labels: , ,

John McCain wins Amman South

Friday, June 13, 2008
As in Amman, the capital of Jordan. Pew Global has asked the world's citizenry which candidate it has the greater confidence in, and McCain wins in Jordan. Obama would win everywhere else, with France and Tanzania the most enthused by the Illinois senator. That Obama would not have un flocon's chance in Hell of winning any elected office in France seems to have passed France by, but never mind....

In other findings, the French and the Japanese are the most likely to think granting the Olympics to Beijing a bad thing (55%) . Rather disgustingly, we Britons think it a good thing, by 50% to 38%. The mouth-breathing 12% presumably did not know what the question meant.

Labels: ,

Hurrah for Denmark. Again

Tuesday, April 15, 2008
The more I read about Denmark, the more I admire her citizens:

"A new Rambøll survey indicates that nearly half of Danes support the country's participation in the current Afghanistan military operation. Despite 10 soldiers having been killed in the past seven months during the campaign, public support has grown from 43 percent in January to 48 percent today. The poll also found a corresponding 5 percent fall in those wishing a total withdrawal of troops from the Asian country". Source

I cannot lay hands on recent figures for support in this country.

Labels: , ,

Shameful. Just shameful.

Wednesday, March 19, 2008
WorldPublicOpinion.org has polled the population of these parts, the US, France, India, South Korea and Indonesia on the opening stages of the genocidal campaign of the Chinese government against the Tibetan people, and less than two thirds of Britons manage to sign up to this, extraordinarily mild, statement:

"Critics of China say that it should allow Tibet to have autonomy, to preserve its traditional culture and to allow the Dalai Lama to return to Tibet".

In contrast, 19% go along with this, "China says that Tibet has long been part of China, that Tibet has benefited from modernization, and that the Dalai Lama should not be allowed to return because he aims to split Tibet from China". And the mouth-breathing remainder (18%) have no opinion.

Meanwhile, top marks to South Korea, with 84% supporting the first statement, and shame on the 63% of Indians who either support the 'People's Republic' or have no opinion. I imagine that the Koreans are well aware of how Beijing used to regard Korea as being its own private plaything too.

Labels: , , ,

Picking Hillary - do the Dems know what they are doing?

Monday, October 22, 2007
Hillary Clinton is the runaway favourite to get the nod from the Dems for their presidential nomination, but a Zogby poll makes her the most divisive of the candidates from both sides - 50% of those polled say that they would never vote for her, a four percentage point rise on the last Zogby poll. She is followed by Kucinich with 49% antipathy, and a preliminary search shows him to be very liberal (in the American sense...). The worst performance for any GOP candidate is Ron Paul, with 47% of pollees 'nevers'. Full disclosure time, Paul is my 'heart' candidate for the presidency.

Down at the other end of the scale, the American people can only muster 34% hostility to Bill Richardson (D), 35% for Huckabee (R) and 37% for Obama.

So, what of Richardson, that he has failed to generate much(-ish) hostility? The Cato Institute rate him "one of the most fiscally responsible Democratic governors", is very popular in New Mexico - "received the highest percentage of votes than in any gubernatorial election in the state's history".

On the social issue shibboleths, "Richardson is pro-choice, supports the death penalty and gun rights, and advocates affirmative action policies in government contracts. While he voted in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, he has since supported LGBT rights in his career as governor; he added sexual orientation and gender identity to New Mexico's list of civil rights categories, and opposes the "don't ask, don't tell" policy".

He is currently the fifth favourite for the Democratic nomination at Betfair (95), and I think a trading bet of a fiver or so might be in order. Here is his campaign website. He looks a bit like a younger and lardier Melvin Bragg.

Labels: ,

Back to the pavilion, Imran?

Saturday, October 20, 2007
Worldpublicopinion.org has polled urban Pakistanis on prospective presidents and the like, and I do wonder whether they have got to grips with this democracy malarkey:

Benazir Bhutto returning to Pakistan to stand for elections? (This was before she actually did)

Favour - 50%
Oppose - 34%

Nawaz Sharif returning to Pakistan to stand for elections?

Favour - 51%
Oppose - 35%

Benazir Bhutto becoming Prime Minister?

Favour - 40%
Oppose - 40%

However one feels about prospective presidents of Pakistan, it does seem rather sad that only 10% of those polled choose to differentiate between supporting Bhutto's right to stand and actually supporting her.

Meanwhile, support for would be contenders stands thus:

Pervez Musharraf - 21%
Benazir Bhutto - 27%
Nawaz Sharif - 21%
Iftikar Chaudhry - 3%
Shaukat Aziz - 2%
Imran Khan - 2% (Not exactly a captain's performance, eh?)
Other- 7%

None of the Pakistani parties are affiliated to what I am going to call the Conservative International, or more correctly the International Democrat Union, so there is no short cut to discovering who are the good guys and gals in Islamabad. Going through the list of Pakistani political parties, they seem to represent varying shades of ghastliness, although Musharraf's / Sharif's lot are described as centrist and Bhutto's lot as leftist.

Labels: ,

The country where 1 in 10 think 9/11 was planned by the US government

Wednesday, September 12, 2007
OK, technically 9.4%. But that is right there in the Land of the Free itself.

More on the 9/11 'Truth' Movement here. But note this from a prof at MIT: "These people (in the 9/11 truth movement) use the 'reverse scientific method’… they determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion

Labels: , ,

">"Absurd in philosophy and formally heretical"

Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Thus did Galileo recant helicocentrism. This came to mind when skimming an EU press release and survey on the Galileo navigation system, which it would be not unreasonable to call 'controversial'.

In order for opinion polls and the like to have any validity, the asking of loaded questions is considered poor form by the UK trade body, but Gallup seems to have been quite happy to do the EU's bidding in the way it formulated its questions.

Having bowled a few easy questions about uses of satnav, the survey then delivered a Shane Warne special:

"Before I ask the next question, let me explain you [sic] a few things about navigation systems. [READ OUT SLOWLY, REPEAT IF NECESSARY] ­ Navigations systems are used by an increasing number of applications, such as for example car navigation, shipping, aviation, in agriculture to monitor the use of chemicals. ­ The US owns and controls GPS, which is primarily for military use, but also provided for civilian use, however without quality of service guarantees.­ Russia and China are working on setting up their alternative navigation systems. These are mostly military systems as well.

Q4a. According to your opinion, should Europe set up its own navigation system, or should Europe rely on American, Russian or Chinese systems?" (My emphases)

Not exactly neutrally worded, was it? Faced with Soviet Union election result of a question, a heroic 20% of the Euro populace were not cowed into giving the answer apparently so devoutly to be wished. The Greeks were the most swayed at 90% and the Danes the least at 61%. Meanwhile, 59% of those polled have not heard of the Galileo project....

And there's more:

"Galileo is the name of the positioning system that the European Union has started to develop seven years ago. Currently, it seems that in order to complete the Galileo system additional public funding is necessary (about €2.4 billion, which is the cost of about 400 km motorway). What do you prefer:
The EU should secure the necessary funds in order to complete Galileo as soon as possible. The EU should not secure extra funds, even if it means that the project will be significantly delayed, or even that it fails".

So more weaselling, no mention of total costs, and a parallel made with something rather less fluffy than say education or healthcare. Even so, 63% wanted to throw good money after bad and 23% prepared to see it 'significantly delayed or even fail'. We, along with the Danes and the Swedes were most prepared to go for the latter, at around a third of those polled, while Bulgarians and Romanians clearly hanker after central planning / know full well that they won't be picking up at the tab, with 79% in favour of further funding. Worth bearing in mind if the news media runs with this 'poll'.

I'm off to Doughty Street shortly, so comment moderation is on.






Labels: ,

That poll in The Telegraph

Monday, May 28, 2007
Which is here, includes the priceless finding that 20% of the population consider Broon to be, get this, 'cheerful and outgoing'. In comparison to on duty undertakers? Angsty adolescents? Small children that have failed to win an egg and spoon race?

Labels: ,

Obligatory gloat at the fate of enthusiasts for the euro

Monday, April 30, 2007
Hidden away in a rather heartening (unless you have the surname 'Blair') YouGov poll in the 'graph is this call and response:

"Which...of the following would you judge to have been Mr Blair's greatest failures?"

"Failing to take Britain into the euro" - 6%

Granted other more popular options included the likes of the sitting, comatose and klieg-lit ducks that are immigration, crime and Iraq, but I'm struggling to wonder just what is going on in the heads of that unreconciled 6%. Meanwhile, the other 94% might find Britain in Europe's Sunset Boulevard webpage of a Parthian shot worth the click.

Labels: , ,

Voter prejudices in the US and France

Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Way back I posted on demographics Americans would not vote for, judging by polling evidence, with the most salient bit this:

"4% would not vote for a woman and 3% would not vote for an African American. However, some prejudices are clearly more palatable - 14% would not vote for a 72 year old (as McCain will be in '08) and 14% would not vote for a Mormon".

I have just laid hands on a broadly comparable French poll from earlier this year:

13% admit that they would be discouraged from voting for a Jew, 22% for a homosexual, and 38% for a Muslim.

And further oddities: 16% would prefer the next president to be male, 21% to be female, and over half want their president to be in his or her 50s. Rather amusingly 21% of right inclined voters consider sang froid a key presidential skill compared to 16% of lefties, and being multilingual is a plus for 54%, versus the 44% who are not bothered.

Combining some of those and sundry other characteristics, robocandidate would walk it if he or she was the following: in his / her 50s, able to understand daily life, honest, a listener, polyglot, a degree holder, Catholic, married and has the same standard of living as the Gaul dans la rue.


So, are Americans less prejudiced than the French, or more wary of what they say to pollsters?

Labels: , ,

Just what's with the over 50s? They are into heroin, mysticism, atheism, questioning their sanity and schmaltz.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Or so a poll of their favourite songs would seem to suggest.

Lennon's turgid 'Imagine' leads - 'No Hell below us, above us only sky' - There's the atheism.

Second, Lady in Red - There's the schmaltz.

Third, 'Stairway to Heaven. Awful, just awful. Give me 'When the Levee Breaks' any day. Mysticism, arrant nonsense and lyrically fuelled by a lot of hash.

Fourth - Stand By Me. Harmless enough.

Fifth - Crazy (Gnarls Barkley, not Cline). Seems to be about insanity.

Sixth - Lou Reed's Perfect Day. Yes, it is about heroin. Accordingly, the Children in Need version provided a huge amount of wry amusement.

Seventh - Good Vibrations. Hmm...

Eighth - Bridge over troubled water. Also widely believed to be about heroin.

Ninth - Closest Thing to Crazy. I'm beginning to worry about them now...

Tenth - Whole lotta love. They could at least have chosen the Muddy Waters 'You need love' that this was ripped off derived from.

Still, no Beatles, so it isn't ALL bad.

Labels:

The French update

Sunday, March 04, 2007
Le Journal du Dimanche has very thoughtfully polled French farmers on voting intentions, and since Libé in reporting that has included a graphic, I'm going to use it:


In a not hugely unexpected result, Sarko and Bayrou fare best with the fillers of formstilllers of the soil, but the extreme left must be enormously disappointed that the coalition of workers and peasants is missing a leg - 3% for the Trots and the Tankies compared to 8.5% among the wider population.

Elsewhere, Sego is sticking with la force de frappe - no nuclear disarmament yonder, and Chirac has attended his 30th successive Salon international de l'agriculture. He must really like charolais bulls, or more likely really likes the votes of their owners. I suppose it is a bit like the ritual homage that Labour politicians used to pay to the miners. Somehow I cannot see Broon being very comfortable mooching around Stoneleigh Park in green wellies and a tweed jacket making nice with the friesans and the hoodens.

Meanwhile, if the Gauls decide they want a crowned head instead of a grubby civilian president, step forward 'Balthazar Napolean de Bourbon, a jovial Indian lawyer and part-time farmer settled in Bhopal', a newly discovered Bourbon dynast. Can't see Prince Henri Philippe Pierre Marie d'Orléans, Comte de Paris, Duc de France, one of the other pretenders being very keen, then again he was disinherited, so to speak, by his father for marrying 'a commoner'.

Labels: ,

Memo to Mr Tony - try reading the Australasian press

Monday, February 05, 2007
Because there you will find headlines like this:

"Labor in strongest electoral position since 2001". (The Australian)

And "Opinion poll puts Labour in front by three points" (NZ Herald).

I am rather unimpressed with the opinions of our Antipodean friends at the moment, frankly.

Labels: , , ,

Opinion poll corner – India

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Back to another of my favourite places. Polling by the Hindustan Times makes for happy reading for the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance, in that if elections had been held in January the UPA would have won an outright majority, gaining seats at the expense of the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance.

Both the BJP and Congress are clearly wed to sane economics, and although there are various breeds of Lefties floating around at least one of the Indian parties with a far left identifying name has been keen on privatisation. Not, however, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) , judging from its equivalent of The Worker, which reports on CPI(M)’s affiliated trade union congress: "With a call ‘Forward To Bigger Class Battles’ Pandhe ended his speech saying, ‘We shall overcome one day!’ "

This rabble, plus sundry others form a third group, the Left Front, which with 59 seats holds the balance of power. They are currently supporting the UPA.

A bit more rooting around shows that coalition building in India must be a rather complex process – 39 parties are represented in the Lok Sabha, plus five independents. Congress and the BJP secured less than half of the total vote in 2003, although they are clearly the Big Beasts – the next biggest party, our chums at the CPI(M) took 5.7% of the vote, and the Bahujan Samaj Party, that of the Dalits (or ‘untouchables’) 5.3%.

Just for a point of comparison, there are ten parties plus two independents in Westminster, 10 parties in Moscow, 11 in Paris and six in Berlin.

As a footnote, Sir William Wedderburn, 4th Baronet, was one of the founders of the Indian National Congress.

Labels: ,

Matters French...

Thursday, January 18, 2007
A slew of polls have been released, and they are looking good for Sarko, even before the revelation that Sego is a Champagne Socialist / of the Gauche Caviar filters through. For the second round - if Sego and Sarko make it, he is favoured 52/48. Meanwhile, 39% of our Gallic chums think Sarko has fought the best campaign, and 26% proffer the laurels to Sego.


Elsewhere, Sarko is laying it on thick : "I have seen many [personal] attacks against me, and I cannot see what purpose they serve....I will not comment on [Sego's] difficulties, and they bring me no pleasure (liar, liar.. C). I want a campaign which is peaceful, honest, transparent, worthy and dignifies France....We do not need low blows, nor personal attacks".

Sounds a bit like Tony Benn and his perennial cry of 'let'sh focush on the isshues, not pershonalities'. Alternatively, the skeletons in Sarko's cupboard are rattling....

Labels: ,

French pollsters asking foolish questions

Monday, January 15, 2007
On the face of it, it might seem a little curious that only 34% of Gauls wish to see a run off between Sarko and Sego in the second round of the Presidential election, but I suspect that asked who they wanted their man or woman to face the wily Gauls concluded that they would rather see a no-hoper as the opposition....

Digging around in the details of Libé's poll, Sarko outpolls Sego for 'understanding the concerns' of manual workers and employees, as does Trotskyite Arlette Laguiller. Maybe the toiling masses are just not ready for quasi-Blairism. In a comparatively encouraging development, 61% are very or somewhat interested in the election, compared to 38% ahead of the 2002 contest. Which makes me think that there will be a Sarko/Sego run off as there will be less willingness to vote for the fringe parties and risk a re-run of the 2002 contest.

Elsewhere, the barbs are flying, with a Socialist spokesperson commenting: "the extreme right is galloping back...Behind the media circus, Nicolas Sarkozy has made a speech that is extremely worrying for our fellow-citizens and our country". And he's like Berlusconi, apparently.

In other coverage, Le Figaro notes that there were some 60 accredited bloggers at the UMP bunfight, most of whom look to have been on side, so to speak, with a few other high profile blogggers thrown into the mix. It looks as though the equivalent of our friend Iain is Loïc Le Meur, who is not only one of the most read, but also owns one of the main blog platforms and advises the UMP on internet strategy. Loïc notes that there more people read blogs in France than the press, which is a bit of jaw dropper, although a sub 8m readership for the printed press is pretty feeble - and less than that for the News of the World alone

Labels: ,

Failing to walk it like you talk it - a Chinese angle

Saturday, January 13, 2007
Chinese millionaires have been surveyed on their likes and dislikes, as China Daily reports. It is largely rather dull stuff, but apparently 10% of them are prepared to 'fess up to their careers being of greater importance than their families. However, looking at the overall sample, when they were questioned about what they like doing with their spare time, travel, swimming and golf all rated higher than doing family things. Ho ho.

Labels: ,