<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/14058325?origin\x3dhttp://croydonian.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

So long, Ariane

Tuesday, November 03, 2009
(Blogging is likely to be light today, so there may well be no Hansard trawls, either ancient or modern, today)

Those helpful people at Eurobarometer have polled eurocitizenry on 'Space activities of the European Union', and the findings are quite telling.

Asked about the 'Importance of space activities for the future international position of the EU', over a third judge them not important, have no idea or fess up to not knowing.  However, the really amusing bit is that the French, they who so love bragging about Ariane, are the most cynical overall, with a majority falling into the nay saying / not knowing category.  Cypriots enthuse wildly, however, with 82% opting for very / important.  Maybe they have episodes of Space 1999 aired nightly in Nicosia.

Asked whether 'Space activities contribute to industrial competiveness, growth and creation of jobs in the
European Union', the French are among the least impressed - 42% don't think so or don't know.  Having passd through Toulouse recently, a city awash with EADS etc propaganda and so forth, that makes a smirk hard to resist.  The Dutch and the Cypriots - not known for their Baikonurs / Kourous / Cape Canaverals are the most convinced. 

Elsewhere, a rather impressive 17% of my fellow Britons claim to have heard of European Earth Observation satellites.  The French near top the poll for being unimpressed with the Galileo satellite project.  I have crossed swords with the EU over its outrageous push polling over Galileo before, I can claim some familiarity.

The Bulgars would appear to have taken Star Trek to heart, in that 93% think space exploration important, with France and Italy both mustering 72% in agreement.  We're in the lower quartlile at 77%.  And it is another yaa boo to the European Space programme in France, with the lowest  level of agreement with 'Space exploration is important as a source of innovation and economic development'.  Nigh on a third of Gauls - by far the highest percentage - want the EU space budget cut, by the way. 

Looked at demographically, chaps prove the space cadets, with a fifth wanting a cut compared to a quarter of women.  Enthusiasm for spending decreases with age too.

And here's a rather attractive photo of an Ariane 5:



Labels: , ,

The UN talks space

Thursday, October 22, 2009
Which are the countries which matter when it comes to space activity?  The US of A, Russia, China, India, Japan and France/ EU.  By my reckoning, and broadly backed up here.

And which countries decided that they had something to add to the UN's debate on 'international cooperation in the peaceful uses of outer space'?

This rather motley crew:

Sweden (for the EU), Pakistan, St Lucia (yes, really), Uruguay, Thailand, Cuba, Kazakhstan, India, Syria, Sudan, China, Colombia, Philippines, Libya, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Japan, and Indonesia.
None of the comments are of any great quality, interest, so I will swear off quoting them, bar this nice piece of DPRK logic:

"The action taken in the Security Council against his country was a clear indication that the Council was not only “devoid of democracy”, but was also “beyond its limit” in pursuing double standards and partiality, he said.  The United States, claiming that the launch by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea was a “ballistic missile” launch for a military purpose, had tabled the issue in the Security Council.  In fact, the country that had launched most satellites so far, and which possessed more than 400 space objects for both military and civil uses in outer space, was the United States.  Following the United States’ logic, the first country to face the condemnation and sanctions should be none other than the United States itself.  

Labels: ,

A thousand years ago...

Friday, February 15, 2008
I headlined a comment on 'collaboration' between NASA and the British National Space Centre as 'The union of a dog with its fleas'. Yes, and here it is.

Anyway, the BNSC is still getting quite excited about hanging with the big boys, "This joint report between the UK and NASA, coupled with the UK's major role in ESA's Aurora programme of planetary exploration and our involvement in helping to shape a Global Exploration Strategy, means the UK is fully exploiting and strategically maximising its technological and scientific strengths in space exploration".

Doubtless. However, a measure of how important the BNSC is to NASA can be found here. Yup, it is a search of the NASA news site that throws up precisely no entries for BNSC. I tried searching the full name, both with Centre and, ugh, Center, and there are no entries for 2008.....

Labels: , ,

To Croydon infinity and beyond

Thursday, May 31, 2007
Malcolm 'I haven't updated my website in months' Wicks, MP of this parish has his mind on much, much higher things - in fact upon space, the final frontier.

In his capacity as Science and Innovation Minister, Wicks has got terribly excited about a document called 'The Global Exploration Strategy: The Framework for Co-ordination', even though the globe is the bit that most pointedly is not being explored. This has been signed up to by NASA, the Russians and a selection of ticks upon the backs of the bigger beasts , including us, and those noted space explorers the Canadians and the Germans, inter alia.

Apparently "this document marks the start of a new era of space exploration".

And how so?

"The British National Space Centre..was fully involved in shaping this document. Following its publication, it is expected that a voluntary, non-binding forum (the International Co-ordination Mechanism) will now be established so that all 14 nations can share their plans for space exploration, and collaborate to strengthen both individual projects and the collective effort".

'Expected', 'non-binding forum'. Not exactly 'Star Trek' is it?

Labels: , ,