<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14058325\x26blogName\x3dChiswickite++-+formerly+The+Croydonian\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://croydonian.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_GB\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://croydonian.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d5887652838424436549', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe", messageHandlersFilter: gapi.iframes.CROSS_ORIGIN_IFRAMES_FILTER, messageHandlers: { 'blogger-ping': function() {} } }); } }); </script>

Logo watch


The Mark of the Beast did not come cheap:

"Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much has been spent on developing the HM Revenue and Customs brand since 2005. [119415]

Dawn Primarolo: Since 2005, £720,000 has been spent on developing the HM Revenue and Customs brand".

Labels:

This entry was posted on Friday, February 23, 2007 at 9:28 am. You can skip to the end and leave a response.

« Home | Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »

Blogger Newmania said... 10:43 am

..but what a bobby dazzler they ended up with . I feel it was all worthwhile  



Blogger CityUnslicker said... 11:34 am

no doubt there will be a new name change too when Darling takes over.  



Blogger The Hitch said... 12:04 pm

Im so impressed im going to pay more tax.
What an effing disgrace , why do they need a brand?  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 12:08 pm

Christ.  



Blogger Croydonian said... 12:34 pm

I would have thought that branding the whole lot of them with a red hot iron might be popular in some quarters.  



Blogger Newmania said... 1:54 pm

Nice one C  



Blogger CityUnslicker said... 2:12 pm

equally, they would like to do that to some of us.....  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 5:55 pm

From loony leftie Bennite to docile Brownite, the inept Primarolo must be the single most hapless and out of her depth Minister in Government. Gordon's protection of such a desperate mediocrity does not bode well for the future...  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 5:59 pm

Dawn's dodgy past would destroy her, were any of our press prepared to investigate.  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 6:42 pm

What dodgy past?  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 7:15 pm

I was going to mention neo-humanist sans serif but I'd rather ask

What dodgy past? too.  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 12:46 am

I agree with HG about the neo humananist sans serif ... why? And who is doing this "branding" except little non-revenue producer, public sector lice who have never had a money-making idea in their foetid little lives? What the hell are they doing getting engaged in "branding" - given that they don't understand the concept. (It's capitalism, stupid.)

However, I also agree with HG that this Dim Prawn dodgy background should be explained to all - preferably with vivid photos, but if not, I can live with just text.  



» Post a Comment