Your cut out and keep guide to which papers are on the side of the angels
The Sun - "HAS David Davis gone stark raving mad? How else can we explain his silly act of self-styled martyrdom?...This was no noble cause. It was a shabby act of treachery. Mr Davis, a second-rate but ferociously ambitious politician, has not forgiven his rival for thrashing him in the Tory leadership race two years ago". So the hotline from No 10 to Nws Group still works.
The Mirror - "This brave gamble by a popular politician from a humble background will make him a hero to many and establish him as rival for the Tory crown". They must really hate / fear Cameron.
Express - No leader comment that I can find. Doubtless there are some micro celebrities in need of attention
Mail - No leader comment that I can find. Quentin Letts likes DD though.
Guardian - "He is right on ID cards, but only on the basis of an excessively sweeping mistrust of the state. The liberty he is concerned with is, almost exclusively, liberty from official interference. There is little place in this conception for freedom from destitution, for example, which only the state can provide". (C sticks his tongue into his lower lip and makes 'stupid' noises)
Independent - "we agree wholeheartedly with the trenchant opposition of the MP for Haltemprice and Howden to "the slow strangulation of fundamental British freedoms" that has taken place in recent years". Crikey.
Times - No leader comment. A dull item by Riddell I could not face.
Telegraph - Mixed, but finishes 'Mr Davis's resignation may have been reckless, misguided and highly disconcerting for the political establishment - but, driven by principle, it is none the less laudable for that'. If they had got it wrong I would be cancelling it today.
FT.com - "On the substance of these issues Mr Davis has right on his side. Pre-charge detention of up to 42 days remains unjustified: this was apparent all over again in Wednesday’s debate. Similarly, the case for curtailing personal freedoms to introduce ID cards has simply not been made. Too many civil liberties have already been taken away".
The Mirror - "This brave gamble by a popular politician from a humble background will make him a hero to many and establish him as rival for the Tory crown". They must really hate / fear Cameron.
Express - No leader comment that I can find. Doubtless there are some micro celebrities in need of attention
Mail - No leader comment that I can find. Quentin Letts likes DD though.
Guardian - "He is right on ID cards, but only on the basis of an excessively sweeping mistrust of the state. The liberty he is concerned with is, almost exclusively, liberty from official interference. There is little place in this conception for freedom from destitution, for example, which only the state can provide". (C sticks his tongue into his lower lip and makes 'stupid' noises)
Independent - "we agree wholeheartedly with the trenchant opposition of the MP for Haltemprice and Howden to "the slow strangulation of fundamental British freedoms" that has taken place in recent years". Crikey.
Times - No leader comment. A dull item by Riddell I could not face.
Telegraph - Mixed, but finishes 'Mr Davis's resignation may have been reckless, misguided and highly disconcerting for the political establishment - but, driven by principle, it is none the less laudable for that'. If they had got it wrong I would be cancelling it today.
FT.com - "On the substance of these issues Mr Davis has right on his side. Pre-charge detention of up to 42 days remains unjustified: this was apparent all over again in Wednesday’s debate. Similarly, the case for curtailing personal freedoms to introduce ID cards has simply not been made. Too many civil liberties have already been taken away".
Labels: David Davis, the media
This entry was posted
on Friday, June 13, 2008 at 6:55 am.
You can skip to the end and leave a response.
Nice little roundup. The mixed media reaction has been incredible, some seriously polarised views - especially in the Comment pieces.
"Express - No leader comment that I can find. "
They're still working on the Diana/Madeline McCann angle to it. Give them time...
The Guardian leaches off the will to live ... Juliam - funny!
Clearly the Sun's article was written by a second-rate and clearly unambitious "journalist". I wonder how long it will take them to change their tune this time.
» Post a Comment