<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14058325\x26blogName\x3dChiswickite++-+formerly+The+Croydonian\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://croydonian.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_GB\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://croydonian.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d5887652838424436549', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Oil prices and 'trouble'

David Howell (remember him? He was a minister about 20 years ago) has an interesting take on Iran and sundry foreign policy headaches worldwide:

"A falling oil price would also solve a number of problems round the world, not just in Iran, such as in states like Venezuela or Nigeria or Sudan, where sky-high oil revenues have helped fuel anti-Western regimes. A clever American and Western strategy would be to go all-out for reducing oil imports radically, seeing the price slide and then coming forward with conciliatory offers to Iran, such as the proposed nuclear-fuel bank". (source).

Weaning ourselves off oil is a no brainer, and has been for years, but it is questionable whether the Amhadinejads and Chavezs of this world would put anything before their attempted grandstanding.
« Home | Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »

Blogger The Hitch said... 11:44 am

And why is oil sky high?
Because it suits those with oil interests (Bush)it doesnt need to be sky high ,there is a glut of oil and more being discoverd all the time , there is more oil under a few square mles of the rickies than the whole of saudi arabi , admittedly it is in shale form , but it is extractable.  



Anonymous Anonymous said... 12:27 pm

Yes , I have thought this was a good idea for a while and the technology is obviously there to be developed as we saw even in the last OPEC move .

I think PHITCH probably has a point that vested interests have no interest in such a plan but i would say this is just normal systemic inertia.

Green the world ..quite good . Destroy the economies of undeserving rag heads and axis iof evil memebers . Exxcelllent  



Blogger Croydonian said... 12:34 pm

I would not pretend to be an expert in oil economics, but Middle East crude must be the cheapest to extract, and only when prices go above a certain level is it worth drilling holes in the likes of the North Sea, doing things with the Alberta oil sands etc etc.  



Blogger CityUnslicker said... 1:06 pm

David Howell is a top golfer now though.  



Blogger Croydonian said... 2:07 pm

CU - probably a lot more fun than being the MP for Guildford...  



» Post a Comment